This paper is one of those and perhaps one explanation for its popularity is that it’s sort of like the Ioannidis paper for this niche.This paper describes sampling and estimation techniques for describing, for example, how many species of insects there are in the rain forest.Authors are encouraged to include a brief summarising discussion of the main results to make them accessible to readers with biology background.Tags: My Personal Essay For CollegeEssays On Tourism In Sri LankaEssays On Sin TaxesSociology PaperCover Letters For Sales Associate In RetailAnalytical Approach To Essay WritingCompare Judaism And Christianity EssayOleg Brandt ThesisEssay About Reading
Today, it’s all about huge consortia and massive data.
Here’s what I found: What I found was a fascinating list of topics, with expected papers like Venter’s synthetic paper and lots of next-gen sequencing reports, but also an interesting view on how these techniques, especially as they apply to metagenomics, are starting to support related fields like conservation biology.
Please note, we are currently updating the 2018 Journal Metrics.
The Journal of Mathematical Biology focuses on mathematical biology - work that uses mathematical approaches to gain biological understanding or explain biological phenomena.
help you make true statements, not about human health interventions, but about ecological ones. A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing.
The 1000 Genomes Project reported in this paper is an ambitious attempt to take the data acquired in the Human Genome Project and figure out what it means.
In fact, one useful way of looking at it is that nothing is ever proven true.
Rather, the alternative theories are shown to be less and less likely, and that happens through the processes that Ioannidis describes. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness Another common theme among the top papers is biodiversity, with 3 of the top 10 papers dealing with this subject.
Specifically, this research shows how scientific studies which seem to give a positive result for a certain effect, such as the effect of Vitamin E and heart disease, are often actually not conclusive when looked at on a larger scale.
In most cases, this isn’t due to any deliberate attempt of the researchers to deceive others about the validity of their work, but rather an effect that arises because researchers try to find the most broad applicability for their results, leading them to tend to overstate their case.