Does the evidence at the site support what the guidebook tells us?The guidebook can only tell you so much about Ludlow and its history.
Does the evidence at the site support what the guidebook tells us?The guidebook can only tell you so much about Ludlow and its history. After king Harold's defeat by William the conqueror, William was concerned about how he would control the country with only a limited number of troops facing a hostile environment.Tags: How To Write Good Essay In EnglishBipolar ProthesisSoftware For Creative WritingEuropean Union Pros And Cons EssaysCharacter Analysis Essay On Oedipus The KingStanford Gsb Essays 2014Foster Care Persuasive EssaysThe Fall Of The Roman Empire Essay
This secondary source however reliable is still less reliable than the first two primary sources.
The last source that I viewed was a series of diagrams.
Romans were "replaced" by Anglo Saxon foes, and these did leave behind a system of castles however these were for Motte and Bailey castles built in the reign of Edward the confessor.
He did not have enough troops to station them everywhere, so he used a very useful tactic that had worked in Normandy previously.
Ludlow Castle Ludlow castle was first referred to in text by chroniclers in 1138, however the date of the castles construction is unknown.
Despite this, architects have managed to date the curtain wall of the inner bailey; its flaking towers and parts of the gatehouse keep to all being from the 11th century.
The "Motte" was a large mound of earth that rose high and on top of it would be a place where the fortified keep would rest.
The "bailey" was an area (often quite large), which housed the residents of the castle.
The only things that can be backed up by visiting the site are the actual physical elements that the castle has.
There is no real way of proving the historical facts, (such as the ownership of the castle over time) by examining the surroundings.